![]() There's certainly less space inside a mini's case than the Studio's, but this is 2010's case design with 2023's parts inside it-USB-C ports and card readers have been worked into tighter quarters. Apple sent us the M2 Pro version of the mini to review, and for many price-conscious power users who prefer or require macOS, it injects just the right amount of Mac Studio performance into the mini's 13-year-old design.Īs for functional complaints, I wish the Mac Studio's acknowledgment that ports on the front of a computer can be useful was extended to the mini. Both the M2 and M2 Pro versions are augmented in ways that will benefit multi-monitor multitasking workstations, and they can do so for substantially less money than the Studio-the M2 mini starts at $599, $100 cheaper than the M1 mini and cheaper than any Mac mini has been since 2014. There was a lot of room between the cheapest Studio and the best M1 Mac mini for a cheaper-but-more-capable system, something for people who could benefit from pro-level performance and extra ports occasionally but who don't need them often enough to justify dropping the money on a Mac Studio.Įnter the new Mac minis. It lacks the internal expandability of the Mac Pro, but the raw performance and power efficiency of the M1 Max and M1 Ultra plus a great port selection make it a viable option for plenty of people who would have bought a fully loaded 27-inch iMac or a low-to-mid-end Mac Pro in the Intel era.īut the $2,000-and-up desktop is still overkill for a lot of people, even for pros and power users. Further Reading Review: The Mac Studio shows us exactly why Apple left Intel behindĪpple's Mac Studio was its most interesting desktop in years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |